|
|
|
Comment from Nandita Ghosh
Is it possible that the
five books deemed significant and therefore studied by American
undergraduates will of necessity be the same as those studied by
students in Lesotho?
What emerges from the survey is very
revealing: the books most strongly recommended as essential
reading for undergraduate college students are the Bible,
The Odyssey, and The Republic. The question is
not that these books are valuable, for indeed they are. The
question is: how did knowledge of these books spread across the
world in the last two hundred years? For an answer we would
obviously have to look at the missionary activity and the processes
of imperialism, which resulted in 85% of the globe under European
control by the middle of the 20th century. As a consequence
of this process, the books valued by the colonized culture did
not get translated very easily back into the culture of the
colonizer. The process was obviously uneven. With
this history of uneven borrowings as everyone's heritage in the
world, the significant question is what kind of global education
does Fairleigh Dickinson want to attempt? To what texts should
the students be exposed? What kinds of confrontations with
cultural difference and engagements with the other shouldwe in
the FDU community facilitate in order to be citizens of a world in
which our mutual relationships are broadcast with a degree of
intimacy unheard of hitherto in our histories?
Nandita Ghosh is
assistant professor of English specializing in postcolonial
fiction and and poststructuralist discourse.
|